« The Gargantuan Goddess Girls (Nine Maidens) | Main | Metrology of Crop Circles »

The Science of Triangles

When I first researched Earth-based astronomy it was based upon the properties of right angled triangles, first of all related just to the periodicity of the Sun and Moon seen from Earth. These properties make right angled triangles, proportional calculators of a remarkable and simple kind. Let me explain since this naturally extends the capability of ancient peoples to perform complex mathematical tasks once they had mastered counting within astronomical cycles. It also led on naturally to the use of triangulation and the measurement of angles in such a way that advanced results could be achieved within a non-scientific (in our sense) culture. 

In other words, such uses for triangles allowed them to do technical tasks without having the same technical background to the task - they had a more direct method.

 Let me show a simple but very sophisticated example. First of all, suppose we have an English foot and want to make the Persian Foot. This can be done using a right angled triangle as per:

triangle-21-20.jpg 

Our first requirement is to make a right angle using the simplest pythagorean triangle of 3 by 4 by 5 feet long, the perimeter being 12 feet or, conceivably, 13 knots in a rope with three stakes. More difficult then is to measure a base of 20 feet and an hypotenuse of 21 feet that touches a vertical formed by the extension of the 4 side of the 3:4:5 triangle.

Each of the 20 feet on the base now projects similarly onto the hypotenuse to define a length equal to one root Persian foot of 21/20 feet.  In the same way, assuming you can do it, all the other ancient measures in the ancient metrologists toolbag can be reconstituted from a single standard.

So important might this process be that another needed tool is a permanent square. Also useful would be a straight edge upon which to operate the base length and, quite possibly a measuring rod of some length, as indeed a Rod in metrology is made up of many feet and the rod is a symbol of measure going back to mythical progenitors of ancient knowledge in most cultures.

 Given that the ancient builders were known to work to one part in 1000 or better, and that measures were consistent, then as Neal and Michell propose their technology for maintaining measures must have been as accurate. However, Neal and Michell do not suggest how these root measures might then have been varied according to two ratios, 441/440 and 176/175. Instead of explaining these again here, the main point for us is that these are very small differences, 441/440 being just 1.002273 feet in the English module. How could this be achieved?

triangle-21-22-440.jpg 

It so happens (see Sacred Number) that 441/440 can be decomposed, and one way is into 21/20 times 21/22. Since we have the Persian foot of 21/20 we can now repeat the process only making the triangle in Persian not English feet and forming the base out of 21 of these and making the hypotenuse 22 Persian feet long.

Instead of reading a foot from the base to the hypotenuse (to get 22 divided by 21) a Persian foot can be made smaller by 21/22 and this, by our decomposition of 441/440, will yield 441/440 of a root English foot, which would be called a standard English foot or more likely the standard Greek foot since the English and Greek measures form different parts of the same module. 

Once you decide you need a lot of one kind of foot, you have the option of generating over a much larger distance the exact length you want using triangulation over the landscape.  I will provide the complementary triangle that is one way to geometrically generate 176/175. Lying behind it all is a practical skill and facility with numbers that is only now being revealed by trying to explain the extraordinary capabilities of prehistoric cultures.

triangle-21-22-176.jpg 

 Here the root Roman foot can be employed to fulfill the decomposition of the ratio 176/175 as 24/25 times 22/21. The Roman foot is  going to be enlarged by 22/21 by reading from the base to the hypotenuse.

The ratio 176/175 is 16 * 11 / 25 * 7 and hence is a polar measure because the 11/7 divides into the polar radius of the Earth in the ancient model. In fact there are 20736000 such feet in the Pole.

Posted on Saturday, December 16, 2006 at 04:09PM by Registered CommenterRichard Heath in | CommentsPost a Comment

PrintView Printer Friendly Version

EmailEmail Article to Friend

Reader Comments

There are no comments for this journal entry. To create a new comment, use the form below.
Editor Permission Required
You must have editing permission for this entry in order to post comments.